PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE USE OF DIGITAL TOOLS IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS' FUNCTIONAL LITERACY IN MATHEMATICS LESSONS
Keywords:
functional literacy, digital tools, mathematical modeling, learning motivation, PISA tasks, distance learning, pedagogical methodsAbstract
In the modern education system, one of the main objectives is to develop students’ ability to apply the knowledge they have acquired in real- life situations. This requirement highlights the necessity of fostering functional literacy. Especially in an era where distance and digital learning are widespread, the purposeful and effective use of digital tools has become an essential component of teachers’ professional competence. Therefore, the integration of digital technologies into the content of education in a coherent manner is a crucial condition for improving the quality of education. This article explores effective ways of using digital tools to develop functional literacy in mathematics among 7th–8th grade students. The study describes the impact of platforms such as GeoGebra, Desmos, Google Forms, Kahoot, Quizizz, and LearningApps on the learning process, and analyzes the role of each in shaping students’ skills. The importance of digital technologies in developing students’ logical thinking, information analysis, and decision-making abilities is illustrated through specific examples. Furthermore, three main types of functional tasks—PISA-format problems, situational tasks, and applied problems—are classified from both content and methodological perspectives, and effective approaches to implementing them in digital format are proposed. Based on a comparison of national and international practices, the article provides pedagogical recommendations.
References
1. Ермекова, А. Р. (2020). PISA тапсырмаларына негізделген математика есептері. Астана: Ұлағат.
2. Қабдықайырова, А. Ж. (2020). Функционалдық сауаттылықты дамытудағы есептердің рөлі. Білім берудегі инновациялар, 2(12), 45–52.
3. Қойгелдиев, А. (2022). Математика және өмір: Функционалдық есептер жинағы. Талдықорған: Мектеп.
4. Леонтьев, А. А. (2003). Основы психолингвистики. Москва: Смысл.
5. Назарбаев Зияткерлік мектептері ДББҰ. (2021). Цифрлық білім беру құралдары: Математика пәніне арналған әдістемелік нұсқаулық. Астана: НЗМ.
6. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
7. Seitbekova, G. (2024). Methodological and theoretical foundations for assessing the functional literacy of students in mathematics. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series Physics, (56), 1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.155rg3
8. Сейтқазина, С. Ж. (2021). Қашықтан оқытудағы педагогикалық тәсілдер. Алматы: Білім.
9. Khramova, L., Lobanova, O., Shmulskaya, L., Firer, A., & Efits, O. (2022). Analysis of conceptual approaches to the definition of the concept of "functional literacy". Amazonia Investiga, 11(55), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.55.07.31
10. Шумейко, Т. С., & Божевольная, Н. В. (2023). Методология разработки учебного пособия по развитию технического творчества с использованием дистанционных технологий. Вестник КазНПУ имени Абая. Серия: Педагогические науки, 79(3), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.51889/2959-5762.2023.79.3.008
11. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arailym Zaitzhanova, Bakhyt Sydykhov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.